Quoting
From the request as it arrives to the quote with its number, on that customer price list.
It reads the request the way it arrives, finds the answer in your catalog, prices it and writes the order into your ERP.
How it worksSix distribution businesses that look nothing alike from the inside. The request arrives differently in each one.
See every typePeaking runs on your own catalog from day one, and writes into your ERP once your team says so.
See the integrationsFour industrial distributors, each with its own measurement window and figures read from its own system.
See the storiesEngineers out of San Francisco and Guadalajara who know industrial distribution from the inside, not from a deck.
Meet the team
Peaking absorbs the commercial work that today waits for somebody to answer with judgment: answering, finding, quoting, writing the order and following up.
Five places where the answer decides the order.
From the request as it arrives to the quote with its number, on that customer price list.
The right product for the application, with the judgment your house uses.
The right replacement on the first try, from a photo of what failed.
Complete technical line items, on time, instead of the ones that fit in the day.
The confirmed order written with its number, without anyone re-keying it.
A catalog that is standardized and ready to sell, instead of half filled descriptions.
The product changes. What decides does not.
Across every one of those, the same three things hold: the answer depends on a person, the clock decides the order, and an incomplete answer does not count.
Read the request and work out what it actually needs.
It arrives read, with what is missing already asked about.
Look the product up in a catalog nobody knows entirely.
The product arrives found, ruled out requirement by requirement.
Check price and availability in another screen.
It comes with that customer price and real availability.
Build the quote, then key it in at the end of the day.
The quote is built and written with its number.
The work that does not look like selling but decides whether the sale happens.
The new hire answers like an experienced one from the first week, because the judgment is available rather than remembered.
The request that lands at nine at night is answered at nine at night.
The same answer, the same pricing and the same availability logic across locations.
What was asked for and not filled, counted, instead of disappearing.

The reason these are one product and not five is that they all depend on the same thing.
What crosses to what, and under which condition it still qualifies.
That customer pricing, their terms and their agreements.
Whatever gets decided ends up written where your team already works.
Every conversation hangs off the same account, whichever channel it came in on.
Implementation starts where the result shows up fastest in your number.
Your operation, your catalog and the real requests you get today.
How the chosen area runs today, measured, and the number to move.
Peaking starts operating there, on your catalog and your technical judgment.
With the number moving, the same knowledge extends to the next one.
No, and we would advise against it. One area first, the one costing you the most, with a measured baseline. The rest extends once that one has moved.
Quoting, because it is where the delay is most visible and the baseline is easiest to measure. But it depends on where your operation actually stops.
No. It removes the work in front of them. The judgment, the relationship and the close stay with your people.
That is normal and it is part of the implementation work. The catalog ends up organized with your own house judgment, and that stays yours.
You've got this.
Peaking shows up to the session already working with your own catalog, so you see it on your part numbers instead of on an example.